account arrow-down-linearrow-down-small arrow-downarrow-download arrow-left-small arrow-leftarrow-link arrow-rightarrow-upaudio-less-volume audio-not-playing audio-plus-volume audio awarded books calendar close-modal closedate document education emailevent Facebookhamburger impact instagramjustice linkedin location-outline location opinion page phonepinterestplay pluspost preview project reports search-bigsearch-old search share startime twitterwelfare youtube zoom-in zoom-out

Non-cognitive impacts of philosophy for children

Researchers: Dr Nadia Siddiqui | Professor Stephen Gorard ...

By Nuffield Foundation

Project overview


This study explored the possible social, emotional and behavioural impacts of the programme Philosophy for Children (P4C). P4C is a well-established learning approach that uses the techniques of philosophical enquiry to enhance the development of primary and secondary students.

In July 2015, the researchers published the results of their randomised control trial evaluation of P4C, funded by the Education Endowment Foundation. This found that P4C could improve children’s progress in maths and reading, with academic benefits more pronounced for disadvantaged pupils.

This supplementary Nuffield-funded study took that trial further, by exploring whether P4C has an impact on non-cognitive outcomes such as:

  • Pupils’ relationships with school, teachers and peers
  • Pupils’ confidence, well-being and self-esteem
  • Pupils’ voice and how they engage with opinions that differ from their own
  • Teachers’ attitudes towards pupils’ learning.

As with the earlier trial, the study focused on pupils in Year 4 and 5 from areas of high social disadvantage. To explore impact, over 1,000 pupils completed detailed questionnaires before and after P4C and their responses were compared to a comparison group of over 1,600 similar pupils (who also acted as the control group for a trial of Youth Social Action).

The results of the study suggested a small positive impact of the P4C intervention on children’s non-cognitive outcomes. However, the design had various limitations and regression analyses suggested perhaps only a small role for the intervention once pupil background characteristics and initial responses had been taken into account. As such, it would be valuable to strengthen the evidence base by conducting a sizeable randomised control trial in the future.

Team


  • Dr Nadia Siddiqui
    Durham University
  • Professor Stephen Gorard
    Durham University
  • Dr Beng Huat See
    Durham University

  • Director, Education
    Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

Search projects

We aim to improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We are an open, collaborative and engaged funder that offers more than money. Through connecting the individual projects we fund, we strengthen their collective impact and give voice to an overarching narrative.

Profile