account arrow-down-linearrow-down-small arrow-downarrow-download arrow-left-small arrow-leftarrow-link arrow-rightarrow-upaudio-less-volume audio-not-playing audio-plus-volume audio awarded books calendar close-modal closedate document education emailevent Facebookhamburger impact instagramjustice linkedin location-outline location opinion page phonepinterestplay pluspost preview project reports search-bigsearch-old search share startime twitterwelfare youtube zoom-in zoom-out

Parents’ beliefs about the time and financial resource they allocate to their children

By Nuffield Foundation

Parents consider that spending money on learning resources such as books, educational games and private tuition is more productive if their children attend a higher quality school.

According to research led by UCL and funded by the Nuffield Foundation, the amount of time and financial resources allocated by parents towards their children varies considerably across families. Differences in available resources might explain a substantial part of this variation. However, parents’ beliefs about these investments are also likely to play a crucial role in their decisions.

The study found that parents believe that if their child attends a higher quality school, they would benefit more from material investments made by their parents, having a higher earning potential at age 30.

Other findings from the study show that while parents believe that school quality matters, they also believe that parental home inputs play a very important role. In fact, they believe that an additional 3 hours per week in terms of time investments or an additional £30 per week in terms of material investments matter more than moving a child from a school which ‘requires improvement’ to a school that is ‘outstanding’.

Generally, parents believe that there is more to be gained from investing more time and money in supporting their children at home than by moving them to a better school; but school quality does matter more to parents as the child gets older.

Co-author Dr Teodora Boneva said: “Given that children from wealthier backgrounds are also more likely to attend better schools, the relationship parents perceive between school quality and material investments might contribute to the low social mobility in England.“

It has been widely documented that parental investments are highly predictive of important life outcomes such as educational attainment, earnings and heath. However, time and financial resources which parents allocate towards their children vary considerably across families.

“The fact that some parents invest less in their children than others is not necessarily a consequence of having less time or money. Differences are also likely to be driven by differences in parental beliefs about the returns to parental investments. The results of our study are important as they help us to identify bottlenecks which prevent parents from investing in their children”, added Dr Boneva.

The study used data from a novel representative survey of nearly 2,000 parents in England with at least one child aged 5-16 years living with them at home.

Parents were provided with different hypothetical scenarios. The participants were asked to picture a child in different home and school circumstance, ranging from schools with Ofsted ratings from ‘requires improvement’ to ‘outstanding’. Next, the researchers varied the amount of time and material investments children received from their parents, and asked respondents to predict how much these children will earn as adults.

The researchers believe that the findings could contribute towards understanding how to encourage parents to invest more into their children.

By Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in EducationWelfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.