Four in ten trainee teachers not teaching five years later

By Nuffield Foundation

New Nuffield-funded IFS research reveals around 40% of teachers who begin their initial training are not in a state school job five years later.

This means of 35,000 or so individuals training to become teachers each year some 14,000 are not teaching five years later.

Initial teacher training is expensive, costing an average of £23,000 per trainee taking into account costs to government and schools. The high drop-out rate means that on average more than £38,000 is spent on training for every teacher still in post five years after completing training.

This research also shows how routes into teaching have changed in recent years, and looks at the costs, benefits and retention rates for each route. School-led routes have grown quickly, with ‘School Direct’ accounting for around one-third of trainees in 2015–16. Teach First has also expanded now accounting for 5% of entrants, although more than 40% of trainees are still trained through traditional university-led postgraduate courses.

Key findings from the report include:
  • The average total cost of initial teacher training (including costs to central government and schools) is currently around £23,000. This, however, masks a lot of variation: from around £17,000 for primary school teachers via an undergraduate degree to around £38,000 per trainee coming via Teach First (£14,000 higher than any other route).
  • 40% of those who begin teacher training are not working as teachers in a state school five years later and there is variation by route of training: around 60% of Teach First trainees have left teaching within five years.
  • Higher initial costs and lower retention rates for Teach First mean that the cost per teacher in school five years after training is more than £60,000 for a Teach First recruit. This compares with between £25,000 and £44,000 for those entering via other routes. This additional cost may be justified by the fact Teach First trainees are disproportionately likely to teach in disadvantaged schools and Teach First may be able to attract graduates who would not otherwise have gone into teaching. The majority of schools involved with training believe the benefit to them outweighs their school’s cost. But the substantial additional cost does need to be weighed against these possible benefits.
  • The introduction of large tax-free bursaries for trainee teachers in shortage subjects represents a significant cost. The highest bursary is now £30,000 (for physics trainees with a first class degree), equivalent to a gross salary of £39,000, which is £17,000 higher than a teachers’ minimum starting salary outside London. There is little evidence on the effectiveness of these high-cost bursaries in terms of recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers. Such evidence is urgently needed.
  • Retention rates are lower where there is an excess supply of trainees. This highlights the need for local demand for teachers to be taken into account in teacher trainee allocations. Places have been allocated on a national ‘first-come first-served’ basis, which means places have not always been taken where they are most needed or by the highest quality applicants, and significant uncertainty from year-to-year.
  • Teacher retention is lower in areas where the pay of other workers is higher. Our research suggests that retention is affected by the relative pay of teachers and other local workers, so national pay restraint for teachers has the potential to reduce retention.
  • Most schools believe that the benefits of initial teacher training are greater than the costs for their school. A non-negligible proportion of school leaders in our survey believe that the benefits of involvement with ITT are lower than the costs, however, particularly for some routes. For example, around 30% of primary school head teachers involved with School Direct salaried reported that the benefits were less than the costs, in comparison with 6% for its predecessor, the Graduate Teacher Programme (GTP).

“The different routes to achieving qualified teacher status in England cost the taxpayer different amounts per trainee. The longer term costs are even more varied, due to differences in retention rates across routes. Dramatic changes to the system of initial teacher training should be based on assessments of the costs of each route in comparison to the benefit it brings, which has evidently not occurred to date. Greater policy attention is also need on how to retain teachers in the long-run. ”, said Ellen Greaves, a co-author of the report.

“A significant and increasing cost of training teachers is the tax-free bursaries awarded to graduates on certain routes, which are not conditional on ever entering the teaching workforce. The effectiveness of these grants needs to be evaluated, both in terms of the quality of graduates they attract and how long these graduates remain as teachers”, said Chris Belfield, a co-author of the report.

Table 1: Key findings across routes
 Number starting training (2015–16)Central costs (average)bSchool costs (average) cRetention rate (five year) d
Undergraduate (HEI-led) a5,440Pri.: £15,158Pri.: £4,123Pri.: 63–66%
Postgraduate (HEI-led)a13,561Pri.: £18,408
Sec.: £22,354
Pri.: £4,286
Sec.: £1,173
Pri.: 58–61%
Sec.: 51–54%
School Centred Initial Teacher Training2,372/td>Pri.: £18,101
Sec.: £20,526
Pri.: £5,355>
Sec.: £3,531
Pri.: 61–64%
Sec.: 56–59%
School Direct (Unsalaried)7,086Pri.: £17,201 Sec.: £19,597Pri.: £5,166
Sec.: £3,554
N/A
School Direct (Salaried)3,166Pri.: £14,811
Sec.: £15,699
Pri.: £2,631
Sec.: £14,566
N/A
Graduate Teacher ProgrammeN/AN/AN/APri.: 65–68%
Sec.: 59–62%
Teach First1,584Sec.: £25,958Sec.: £10,567Sec.: 37–44%

a HEI refers to Higher Education Institution
b Central costs refers to the average costs to central government, in 2013–14. These costs include the cost of direct grants paid to schools, providers and trainees, the cost of providing student finance, and the cost of bursaries for trainees in priority subjects. The average cost is calculated using the number of trainees with particular characteristics that affect funding (such as degree class for bursary funding).
c School costs refer to the indirect and direct monetary costs reported by schools, and calculated from external sources, net of monetary benefits to the school.
d Retention rate refers to the proportion of trainees that are ‘in service’ in state schools in England the fifth year following expected ‘qualified teacher status’ date. This is the latest possible retention rate it is possible to calculate using the data available to us. It is not possible to observe longer-run retention rates for School Direct, given the timing of the introduction of these routes.

Related


By Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

New

Education | 2020 - 2020

The impact of COVID-19 on mainstream schools in England

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2021

Post-16 educational trajectories and social inequalities in political engagement

View project
Young-boy-wearing-glasses-watches-laptop-school-lesson-with-notepad-The-effects-COVID-19-on-families-time-use-child-development-PROJ
New

Education | 2020 - 2022

The effects of COVID-19 on families’ time-use and child development

View project
Teenage-girl-looks-at-smartphone-next-to-laptop-Growing-up-under-COVID-19-PROJ
New

Education | Welfare | 2020 - 2021

Growing up under COVID-19

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2022

Comparisons of cognitive skills and educational attainment across the UK

View project
Man-massages-own-hand-Longitudinal-evidence-how-arthritis-affects-earnings-PROJ
New

Welfare | 2020 - 2022

How arthritis affects earnings over time

View project
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

Competitive effects of free schools on student outcomes in neighbouring schools

View project
Teenage-pupil-wearing-woolly-hat-writes-on-whiteboard-The-influence-of-headteachers-on-their-schools-PROJ
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

The influence of headteachers on their schools

View project
Two young girls being taught fractions and decimals, learning from a school workbook together
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2021

Teaching fractions and decimals to children aged 3 to 11

View project
In progress

Education | Welfare | 2020 - 2020

Measuring the disadvantage attainment gap in 16-19 education

View project
Early years worker sitting at table with children
New

Education | 2020 - 2021

The ‘common elements’ approach: improving outcomes in early childhood education

View project
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

Teacher supply, shortages and working conditions in England and Wales

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2020

The impact of COVID-19 on mainstream schools in England

View project
Early years worker sitting at table with children
New

Education | 2020 - 2021

The ‘common elements’ approach: improving outcomes in early childhood education

View project
Teenage-girl-looks-at-smartphone-next-to-laptop-Growing-up-under-COVID-19-PROJ
New

Education | Welfare | 2020 - 2021

Growing up under COVID-19

View project
Young-boy-wearing-glasses-watches-laptop-school-lesson-with-notepad-The-effects-COVID-19-on-families-time-use-child-development-PROJ
New

Education | 2020 - 2022

The effects of COVID-19 on families’ time-use and child development

View project
Man-massages-own-hand-Longitudinal-evidence-how-arthritis-affects-earnings-PROJ
New

Welfare | 2020 - 2022

How arthritis affects earnings over time

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2021

Post-16 educational trajectories and social inequalities in political engagement

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2022

Comparisons of cognitive skills and educational attainment across the UK

View project
Two young girls being taught fractions and decimals, learning from a school workbook together
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2021

Teaching fractions and decimals to children aged 3 to 11

View project
Teenage-pupil-wearing-woolly-hat-writes-on-whiteboard-The-influence-of-headteachers-on-their-schools-PROJ
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

The influence of headteachers on their schools

View project
Young-child-blurred-in-background-plays-with-abacus-in-foreground-Early-years-employment-pathways-PROJ
In progress

Education | 2019 - 2020

A systematic review of early years degrees and employment pathways

View project
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

Teacher supply, shortages and working conditions in England and Wales

View project
man reading picture book to baby
In progress

Education | 2019 - 2022

Do infants learn new words from educational picture books?

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2020

The impact of COVID-19 on mainstream schools in England

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2021

Post-16 educational trajectories and social inequalities in political engagement

View project
Young-boy-wearing-glasses-watches-laptop-school-lesson-with-notepad-The-effects-COVID-19-on-families-time-use-child-development-PROJ
New

Education | 2020 - 2022

The effects of COVID-19 on families’ time-use and child development

View project
Teenage-girl-looks-at-smartphone-next-to-laptop-Growing-up-under-COVID-19-PROJ
New

Education | Welfare | 2020 - 2021

Growing up under COVID-19

View project
Man-massages-own-hand-Longitudinal-evidence-how-arthritis-affects-earnings-PROJ
New

Welfare | 2020 - 2022

How arthritis affects earnings over time

View project
New

Education | 2020 - 2022

Comparisons of cognitive skills and educational attainment across the UK

View project
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

Competitive effects of free schools on student outcomes in neighbouring schools

View project
In progress

Education | Welfare | 2020 - 2020

Measuring the disadvantage attainment gap in 16-19 education

View project
Early years worker sitting at table with children
New

Education | 2020 - 2021

The ‘common elements’ approach: improving outcomes in early childhood education

View project
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

Teacher supply, shortages and working conditions in England and Wales

View project
Teenage-pupil-wearing-woolly-hat-writes-on-whiteboard-The-influence-of-headteachers-on-their-schools-PROJ
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2022

The influence of headteachers on their schools

View project
Two young girls being taught fractions and decimals, learning from a school workbook together
In progress

Education | 2020 - 2021

Teaching fractions and decimals to children aged 3 to 11

View project
Maths resit students taking exam
Reported

Education | 2019 - 2020

A new mathematics GCSE curriculum for post-16 resit students

View project
Reported

Education | 2018 - 2018

GCSE and A-level results day project

View project
Reported

Education | 2018 - 2020

Teaching reading: an integrated programme for deaf & hearing children

View project
Reported

Education | 2018 - 2019

Developing a sustainable intervention for disadvantaged children

View project
Reported

Education | 2017 - 2018

Growing up digital

View project
Reported

Education | 2017 - 2020

Educational attainment of children in need & children in care

View project
Reported

Education | 2017 - 2020

Mathematics in Further Education Colleges (MiFEC)

View project
Teacher and young schoolgirl in classroom look at building blocks brain training game together
Reported

Education | 2017 - 2019

Trialling an executive function training intervention for preschoolers

View project
Reported

Education | Welfare | 2017 - 2019

Undermatch in higher education: prevalence, drivers and outcomes

View project
Reported

Welfare | 2017 - 2019

The economic integration of refugees in the UK

View project
Reported

Education | 2017 - 2018

The effect of retention and turnover on the teaching workforce

View project
Reported

Education | 2016 - 2019

A follow up survey of break and lunch times in schools

View project
Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in EducationWelfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile