account arrow-down-linearrow-down-small arrow-downarrow-download arrow-left-small arrow-leftarrow-link arrow-rightarrow-upaudio-less-volume audio-not-playing audio-plus-volume audio awarded books calendar close-modal closedate document education emailevent Facebookhamburger impact instagramjustice linkedin location-outline location opinion page phonepinterestplay pluspost preview project reports search-bigsearch-old search share startime twitterwelfare youtube zoom-in zoom-out

Mediation needed in defamation claims

By Nuffield Foundation

Defamation cases should be mediated and, if they are not, they should be the subject of an early neutral evaluation by a High Court Judge.

Published today and funded by the Nuffield Foundation, The Alternative Libel Project’s first report, from Index on Censorship and English PEN, also recommends that:

  • Judges must use stricter case management
  • Litigants should be able to make a stand alone application to determine the meaning of the allegations in question
  • A costs regime must be introduced to redress the inequality of arms between the parties.

Jonathan Heawood, Director of English PEN said:

“Mediation has an extremely high success rate in libel actions. It allows both parties to get straight to the heart of their dispute and can result in a settlement which both parties are happy with, at a fraction of what the case might otherwise cost.”

John Kampfner, Chief Executive of Index on Censorship said:

“Defamation procedure needs to change so the balance between freedom of expression and reputation is not affected by the relative resources of litigants but by the strength of their claims. The recommendations we have made will not only result in many more cases being resolved very early on, they will ensure that those cases that do go to trial in the High Court are dealt with more efficiently.”

The preliminary report will be launched today at a reception held at the Nuffield Foundation. Lord McNally, Minister of State at the Ministry of Justice, and Sir Stephen Sedley, who chairs the Alternative Libel Project’s advisory committee, will both speak at the reception.

The report is a preliminary one and Index on Censorship and English PEN are inviting views on their proposals before the 18 November.

Notes to editors

  • The Alternative Libel Project’s preliminary report will be launched today, 6th October, at 12 noon, at the Nuffield Foundation, 28 Bedford Square, London WC1B 3JS.
  • The Nuffield Foundation has funded this project but the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.
  • English PEN is a registered charity (number 1125610), with the object of promoting the human rights of writers, authors, editors, publishers and other persons similarly engaged throughout the world.
  • Index on Censorship promotes freedom of expression through the Writers and Scholars Educational Trust (registered charity, number 325003).
By Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in EducationWelfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.