Criminal justice system deals with fewer than two per cent of detected fraudsters

By Nuffield Foundation

A new study from the University of Portsmouth, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, find that fewer than 2% of people caught committing fraud are dealt with by the criminal justice system.

The research found only 15,696 fraud offenders were dealt with by the criminal justice system in 2014-15, with a further 162,869 if TV licence evasion was also included. These offenders were caught by bodies such as the police, Serious Fraud Office or Department for Work and Pensions, and then prosecuted in the criminal courts. The research also found at least another 868,105 fraudsters were dealt with by private bodies such as fraudster registers and by regulatory bodies in the same year.

The major study was conducted by researchers from the University’s Institute of Criminal Justice Studies and funded by the Nuffield Foundation.

Principal investigator Professor Mark Button said: “This research highlights that the criminal justice system plays only a small role dealing with fraud related cases and the vast majority are dealt with by other public and private regulators.

“The nature and quality of the systems operated by these regulators does vary significantly. There are also large inconsistencies in the way comparable frauds are dealt with -justi some resulting in criminal prosecution, others only a regulatory sanction.”

The largest regulator was the NHS, which issued 606,063 penalty notices against those wrongly claiming exemption from NHS charges. At least 135,485 people who made fraudulent credit or employment applications were also added to private databases, such as the Cifas National Fraud Database, as ‘confirmed fraudsters’.

The research also investigated professional regulatory bodies and found 395 cases of what most would regard as serious cases of fraud had been dealt with solely by them. For example:

  • Finance director Nicholas Hill abused his position to defraud his employer of £250,000 using carefully planned purchasing and asset sale frauds. He was not reported to the police but was referred to the accountancy regulator, the ICAEW. He was struck off, fined £25,000 and ordered to pay £33,846 in costs for the case hearing (ICAEW, February 2014).
  • Alberto Micalizzi was the chief executive of Dynamic Decisions Capital Management, a hedge fund management firm which went into liquidation. He misled investors, lenders, the FSA and others. He deliberately hid the fund’s losses to attract new investors by buying a bond and then artificially revaluing it to create a US$400m gain. The FCA did not find sufficient evidence for a prosecution. The FCA banned him and fined him £2,700,000 (FCA reference AXM02173).
  • Karen Wilson was a senior occupational therapist who perpetrated an expense fraud against her employer worth £2,788. She was not prosecuted but was removed from the register of the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC reference OT14127).

The finding that at least 1,046,670 people have been found to have engaged in fraud-related behaviours also illustrates how widespread the problem of fraud is in society.

The report illustrates different rates of offending in society and between different occupations. For example, the number of detected fraudsters per 100,000 was 25 for solicitors, 15 for the financial services sector, 13 for nurses, seven for chartered accountants and three for architects.

The research assessed 128 regulatory bodies and identified 71 which deal with fraud and 25 fraud-related databases. The findings highlighted significant differences in the quality of justice among regulatory bodies and highlights areas in need of further research and reform to improve justice.

The research is published not long after recent changes to the way crime statistics are collected to include questions about fraud in the England and Wales Crime Survey, which has highlighted an additional 3.6 million crimes related to fraud. When added to other crimes in the New Year, along with computer misuse offences, is likely to see a near doubling of crime.

This reports highlights priority areas for research to better understand these regulators and areas where policy reform is required to improve the quality of justice.” Professor Mark Button, Principal Investigator

Related


By Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
Little boy at home looking pensive, playing a game on a smartphone

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Linking household benefits, financial precarity and child welfare

View project
Man holds girl's hand as he walks her to primary school

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Improving safeguarding outcomes after adoption or special guardianship

View project
Mother and small child on a bus looking out of the window together and playing a game naming the things they see

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Parental Advocacy in England: a realist evaluation of implementation

View project
Portrait of a teenager in front of a blue shed, looking at the camera

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Children in police custody: piloting a ‘Child First’ approach 

View project
Father and child washing up in the kitchen

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Physical punishment and child outcomes in the UK

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Man turns towards the camera, walking in a town, with other walkers in the background

Justice | 2023 - 2023

Creating and using better justice data

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
Portrait of a teenager in front of a blue shed, looking at the camera

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Children in police custody: piloting a ‘Child First’ approach 

View project
Man holds girl's hand as he walks her to primary school

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Improving safeguarding outcomes after adoption or special guardianship

View project
Mother and small child on a bus looking out of the window together and playing a game naming the things they see

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Parental Advocacy in England: a realist evaluation of implementation

View project
Little boy at home looking pensive, playing a game on a smartphone

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Linking household benefits, financial precarity and child welfare

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Man leading a focus group listening to the participants speaking

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Lived experience of the law: a research and policy project

View project
Group of teenage boys at school in uniform
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2025

Exploring racial disparity in diversion from the youth justice system

View project
Dad holding baby walking with two kids
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Administrative fairness in the digital welfare state

View project
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Transparency and judicial review: a study of the duty of candour

View project
A teenage boy outdoors
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Child First: examining children’s collaboration in the Youth Justice System

View project
Young men looking puzzled as they look to another man for advice
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

The role of communities and connections in social welfare legal advice

View project
Mural artwork by Jacob V Joyce
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Transformative justice, women with convictions and uniting communities

View project
Two children walk ahead of two adults, one pushing a pram
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Voluntary care plans for children in Scotland: using Section 25 orders

View project
Rethinking domestic abuse in child protection: responding differently
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Rethinking domestic abuse in child protection: responding differently

View project
An older couple using a tablet to make a video call: Understanding local legal needs and supporting early intervention
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Understanding local legal needs and supporting early intervention

View project
A woman helping a little girl get ready for school
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Race, religion and representation among care-experienced children

View project
A parent or carer holds a small child
In progress

Justice | 2020 - 2023

Discharge of care orders: a national study

View project
A little girl smiles at her father
In progress

Justice | 2021 - 2024

Substituted parenting: what does this mean in the family court?

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Reported

Justice | 2021 - 2023

Delivering administrative justice after the pandemic

View project
Siblings play ball in a playground - Siblings Contact and the Law
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2021

Guidance to judges on the anonymisation of children judgements

View project
Lawyer taking witness statement from male witness
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The production of witness statements by lawyers and litigants in person

View project
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2022

When is a wedding not a marriage? Exploring non-legally binding ceremonies

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2022

The Edinburgh Study: causes and impacts of criminal justice pathways

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2015 - 2018

Bridging the Evidence Gap in Family Proceedings

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2018

The impact of Litigants in Person on the Northern Ireland court system

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2017

Transparency and privacy in family courts

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2019

Implementation of recommendations of the Carlile report

View project
Reported

Justice | 2017 - 2020

Enhancing problem-solving practice in youth court

View project
Reported

Justice | 2013 - 2019

Timely disclosures mean timely interventions for young offenders and victims

View project
Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile