account arrow-down-linearrow-down-small arrow-downarrow-download arrow-left-small arrow-leftarrow-link arrow-rightarrow-upaudio-less-volume audio-not-playing audio-plus-volume audio awarded books calendar close-modal closedate document education emailevent Facebookhamburger impact instagramjustice linkedin location-outline location opinion page phonepinterestplay pluspost preview project reports search-bigsearch-old search share startime twitterwelfare youtube zoom-in zoom-out

Use of informal childcare has increased since 1998

By Nuffield Foundation

A new report shows that a decade after the introduction of the National Childcare Strategy, a large number of families continue to use informal childcare, usually grandparents, to meet their childcare needs.

Families often use informal care as part of a ‘package’ that includes both formal and informal care, particularly for preschool children. It is more likely than formal care to be used to cover non-standard work or study hours, and is used by families across the socio-economic spectrum and for children of all ages.

The report, The role of informal childcare: a synthesis and critical review of the evidence, was undertaken by researchers from Bryson Purdon Social Research, the Institute for Fiscal Studies and NatCen Social Research. It was funded by the Nuffield Foundation and a summary report is also available. For the purposes of the report, ‘informal care’ refers to childcare provided by non-parental family and friends.

More families were using informal childcare in 2008 than in 1998, reflecting the increase in the number of working families, both lone parents and couples, during this period. The use of formal childcare has also increased (more sharply than informal care), largely as a result of government interventions such as the National Childcare Strategy.

Cost is not the only factor

Although the fact that informal care is a low or no cost option is an important factor in parents’ reasons for choosing informal providers, it is rarely their sole or primary reason. For example, parents often cite the ‘caring environment’ offered by informal care as their reason for choosing it.

The research team found no significant advantages or disadvantages to children’s educational or socio-emotional outcomes as a result of being looked after by informal carers. Any small associations identified at age three usually disappear by age five.

No evidence for government intervention in informal childcare

Following examination of the economic arguments for government intervention to encourage or support the use of informal childcare, the research team concluded there was no evidence to support such intervention. In particular, it is not possible to tell whether remunerating informal childcarers would lead to an increase in the use of informal care.

Explore our projects

Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in EducationWelfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile