Trust in transition: what does new research evidence tell us about public trust and compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic?

From the start of the pandemic it has been clear that this was going to be more than just a public health crisis. COVID-19 has both accelerated and dramatised some of the most urgent social, economic and technological trends and stress points in our society, challenging institutional structures and forcing governments to account to their citizens in an unforgiving international context. 

At the heart of the pandemic and its implications has been the question of public trust – the relationship between consent and authority, self-interest and solidarity. Trust in the handling of the pandemic has been grounded in the interpretation of epidemiological data, “following the science”, and in wider questions about inequalities of risk, suffering, intergenerational equity and long-term outcomes.

At a recent Nuffield Foundation webinar, Trust in Transition, three research projects brought many of these issues together. The Foundation has committed over £2m to research projects that are charting the social, educational and economic effects of the pandemic as it develops. The first waves of research reveal quite dramatic shifts in public sentiment and behaviours over the course of the first weeks of the pandemic; they give a foretaste of the enduring volatility of our social contract and the uncertainties of what will follow.

Emerging trends in compliance and trust

Boris Johnson is quoted as saying he has learnt that it is much easier to take people’s freedoms away than to give them back. Joe Tomlinson, from York Law School, has explored how people view the trade-offs between their individual rights and the greater good; he has identified why there were initially such high levels of compliance with the draconian restrictions on personal freedom – where concern for family was more than matched by a sense of public solidarity with the NHS; but he questions how resilient this will prove to be.   

Rasmus Nielsen from the Reuters Institute at the University of Oxford and Alex Freeman from the Winton Centre at the University of Cambridge charted the interaction between trust in government, media and scientists. The Reuters research suggests the speed of the decline of trust in government competence in the UK has been unprecedented; (trust in news organisations has also declined but at a lesser rate). As the virus progressed, what Rasmus Nielsen called the initial “rally round the flag – we are all in it together” public response has given way to a realisation that the virus’ effects have been far from equal – most devastating in the most socially disadvantaged areas of the UK and among some minority ethnic groups.  As in the Brexit and election debates about “levelling up” and “the left behind”, geography has again proved its significance in British society. 

The international picture

However, what has made the pandemic different is the way it has unusually, in the grim league tables of comparative mortality rates, forced international comparisons to the fore of the UK debate. The most striking aspect of Alex Freeman’s survey across 11 countries in Europe, North and South America, China and Asia, was its demonstration of how different are some cultural determinants of public trust. Her qualitative research gives a voice to the data. Japan is the unlikely outlier in having generally lower levels of public trust, revealing a vituperative public disdain for government – “a group of idiots”, “I hope the Prime Minister dies of the virus” – and uniquely high levels of distrust in the WHO due to perceptions of its association with Chinese influence. Germany’s success in handling the pandemic correlates with it having high levels of public understanding of the official messaging. In the UK, though we may comfort ourselves that we have avoided the visceral public health politics fomented by the White House that have so disfigured the US debate, Rasmus Nielsen also produced sobering survey data that suggests that, in the UK too, there has been a deeply partisan divide on Left/Right lines regarding government handling of the virus.

“Following the science”

What most worried the researchers? For Alex Freeman, it was a growing sense that trust in “official science” may also be eroding. Joe Tomlinson identified our preparedness to comply as likely depending on a belief in both the competence and the transparency of governmental authority. He enumerated those factors that risk undermining the delicate accommodation reached initially in the face of the extremity of the virus – ineffectiveness of the rules, other people not complying, unacceptable rights violations, over enforcement, procedural unfairness. Most of these shortcomings will be laid at the door of government, but when government defends itself by claiming that its authority derives from “following the science”, then there must be a risk that the independent evidence the epidemiologists provide can itself appear compromised. As Rasmus Nielsen observed, this problem may be compounded by our desire to see science as definitive, when in fact research science is defined by uncertainty. In this sense, medical science may be about to face the scepticism of experts that has eroded trust in other evidence-based policy in recent years.

Yet, as Rasmus Nielsen concluded, healthy democratic scepticism may be a strength. Rather this than some of the responses in Alex Freemans’s survey of Chinese opinion where trust in social media appears to be greater than elsewhere because, as it was regulated by government, it must be right. As one respondent put it – “Believe in the country, support the country, co-operate with the country”. Elsewhere it is not quite that simple – but as Alex Freeman’s research concludes, people follow advice they trust.

 

Event recording


About the author


  • Tim Gardam

Prior to joining the Nuffield Foundation in September 2016, Tim was Principal of St Anne’s College at the University of Oxford, a post he held for 12 years. He is also Chairman of the Which? Council.

Tim worked for 25 years in senior broadcasting roles, starting at the BBC where he was editor of Panorama and Newsnight, and later becoming Head of Current Affairs and Weekly News. He was Director of Television and Director of Programmes at Channel 4 from 1998 to 2003. From 2008 to 2015 Tim was a member of the Ofcom Board and was Chair of the Ofcom Content Board.

Tim was also the author of the Department for Culture Media and Sport Review of BBC Digital Radio Services in 2004, a member of Lord Burns’ Advisory Panel on the BBC Charter Review and a Director of SMG plc from 2005-7.

Related projects


Explore our projects

New

Welfare | 2024 - 2027

Gypsy, Roma, Traveller Youth: mitigating exclusions using the digital?

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2027

Performance Tracker 

View project
Mother wearing hijab holding her toddler son on her knee, smiling at each other
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2025

Afghan resettlement in England: outcomes and experiences 

View project
A woman is sat on the edge of a bed staring at her phone while her daughter is in the background.
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Virtual parent support portals: a new research and practice agenda

View project
A middle-aged man sat at home is looking at this phone while sorting pension paperwork.
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Collective defined contribution pensions with investment choice

View project
three women walking along street laughing and smiling
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Revealing social capital

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2026

Universal Credit, good work and progression

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2027

Gypsy, Roma, Traveller Youth: mitigating exclusions using the digital?

View project
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2027

Performance Tracker 

View project
Mother wearing hijab holding her toddler son on her knee, smiling at each other
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2025

Afghan resettlement in England: outcomes and experiences 

View project
three women walking along street laughing and smiling
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Revealing social capital

View project
A middle-aged man sat at home is looking at this phone while sorting pension paperwork.
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Collective defined contribution pensions with investment choice

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2026

Universal Credit, good work and progression

View project
A woman is sat on the edge of a bed staring at her phone while her daughter is in the background.
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Virtual parent support portals: a new research and practice agenda

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
A woman is sat on the edge of a bed staring at her phone while her daughter is in the background.
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Virtual parent support portals: a new research and practice agenda

View project
Teenager hugging their mother
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2026

The long-term effects of being a young carer

View project
Elderly woman and adult daughter out shopping
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2026

Connecting pensions, health and care

View project
Mother, father, son and daughter standing in front of their house
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

A regional regeneration index to track socioeconomic ‘Levelling Up’

View project
Man working on a laptop using sign language on a video call
In progress

Welfare | 2023 - 2024

Designing inclusive remote and hybrid working to support disabled workers

View project
Group of teenage boys at school in uniform
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2025

Exploring racial disparity in diversion from the youth justice system

View project
Children walking with their parents in the countryside
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Children’s lives in changing places

View project
Dad holding baby walking with two kids
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Administrative fairness in the digital welfare state

View project
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Transparency and judicial review: a study of the duty of candour

View project
Older man working from home on a video call
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2023

The impact of pension auto-enrolment and COVID-19 on saving behaviours

View project
Worried woman alone in a room, resting her head on her arms
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Links between cognitive impairment and exploitation in England

View project
A teenage boy outdoors
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Child First: examining children’s collaboration in the Youth Justice System

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2027

Gypsy, Roma, Traveller Youth: mitigating exclusions using the digital?

View project
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2027

Performance Tracker 

View project
Mother wearing hijab holding her toddler son on her knee, smiling at each other
New

Welfare | 2024 - 2025

Afghan resettlement in England: outcomes and experiences 

View project
three women walking along street laughing and smiling
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Revealing social capital

View project
A middle-aged man sat at home is looking at this phone while sorting pension paperwork.
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

Collective defined contribution pensions with investment choice

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2026

Universal Credit, good work and progression

View project
Three colleagues smiling and talking at work
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2026

Arthritis, work and wellbeing: a mixed methods study with policy recommendations

View project
A man driving a van at work
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

The PAW Trial: feasibility and acceptability of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit

View project
Two older women swimming in their local pool
New

Welfare | 2023 - 2025

The psychological, social and economic impact of musculoskeletal conditions

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Grandparents having fun outdoors with their granddaughter, who is eating an apple and laughing: Understanding family and community vulnerabilities in transition to net zero
Reported

Welfare | 2021 - 2023

Understanding family and community vulnerabilities in transition to net zero

View project
Father and son using laptop at home
Reported

Welfare | 2021 - 2024

Developing a minimum digital living standard for households with children

View project
Reported

Justice | 2021 - 2023

Delivering administrative justice after the pandemic

View project
Side view of two female high school students in classroom working on laptops social distancing. Student in foreground is in focus and student in background is blurred
Reported

Education | 2021 - 2022

COVID-19 and disadvantage gaps in England 2020 and 2021

View project
Siblings play ball in a playground - Siblings Contact and the Law
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2021

Guidance to judges on the anonymisation of children judgements

View project
Lawyer taking witness statement from male witness
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The production of witness statements by lawyers and litigants in person

View project
Close up of a young girl and her father wearing protective face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic outside.
Reported

Welfare | 2021 - 2023

The Economy 2030 Inquiry: navigating a decade of change

View project
Young boy draws and plays with a globe as part of nursery education
Reported

Education | 2020 - 2022

COVID-19 and childcare: local impacts across England

View project
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2022

When is a wedding not a marriage? Exploring non-legally binding ceremonies

View project
Reported

Education | 2020 - 2021

COVID-19 mitigation measures: education provision and access to special schools

View project
Young-boy-uses-tablet-with-mother-for-maths-learning-Can-maths-apps-add-value-to-learning-PROJ
Reported

Education | 2020 - 2022

Can maths apps add value to learning?

View project
Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile