account arrow-down-linearrow-down-small arrow-downarrow-download arrow-left-small arrow-leftarrow-link arrow-rightarrow-upaudio-less-volume audio-not-playing audio-plus-volume audio awarded books calendar close-modal closedate delete document education emailevent Facebookhamburger impact instagramjustice linkedin location-outline location opinion page phonepinterestplay pluspost preview project reports search-bigsearch-old search share star-full star-open startime twitterwelfare youtube zoom-in zoom-out

The future of forensic bioinformation

Researchers: Dr Carole McCartney

Project overview


A team of academics led by Dr Carole McCartney from the University of Leeds has identified four principles for the preparation of new legislation into the use foresnic bioinformation by the justice system.

The proposals were made following an investigation into how our justice system uses forensic bioinformation, including an assessment of changes in forensic science policy over recent years. The starting point for Dr McCartney’s team was the The Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ report on forensic bioinformation.

Researchers held a series of expert meetings to examine what is known about forensic processes within the justice system, and the operation and governance of forensic bioinformation databases, with the aim of producing concrete proposals informed by operational and policy viewpoints for use by policy makers, legislators, forensic scientists, police staff and prosecutors.

The four proposed principals for any new legislation governing the collection, retention and use of biological materials are:

  • Proper consideration should be given, amongst other things, to an approach based a case by case scrutiny of retention decisions.
  • The legislation and its implementation should be sufficiently robust and comprehensive to minimise the risk of later changes.
  • There should be discretion for investigators to retain and share forensic bioinformation when there is a professional need, and such discretion should be proportionate and be subject, in line with the MOPI code, to regular and effective review and audit and open to challenge before an independent tribunal.
  • The new arrangements should be informed and regulated by a new independent statutory governance body (described below as the audit and ethics body). This would oversee all forms of forensic bioinformation, based on effective audit arrangements, adequate data collection and publication, the commissioning of research and ultimately should be accountable directly to Parliament.

Team


  • Dr Carole McCartney
    University of Leeds

  • Director, Welfare
    Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

In progress

Justice | 2019 - 2022

Understanding criminogenic influences on youth offending

View project
In progress

Welfare | 2019 - 2022

Children living with domestic violence: effects on children’s well-being

View project
In progress

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The Edinburgh Study: causes and impacts of criminal justice pathways

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2019 - 2021

Girls and women with experience of care and the criminal justice system

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

The implementation of new rules and guidance for permanent foster care

View project
In progress

Justice | 2018 - 2020

Paths to administrative justice in Wales

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

System conditions and welfare inequalities in children’s services

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

Looked after children grown up

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2019

Pathways of incarcerated children in care

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2018

Visualising data in care proceedings

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2018

Addressing the ‘care cases’ crisis: a sector-led review

View project
Reported

Justice | 2017 - 2019

Immigration judicial reviews

View project
In progress

Welfare | 2019 - 2022

Children living with domestic violence: effects on children’s well-being

View project
In progress

Justice | 2019 - 2022

Understanding criminogenic influences on youth offending

View project
In progress

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The Edinburgh Study: causes and impacts of criminal justice pathways

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2015 - 2018

Bridging the Evidence Gap in Family Proceedings

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2018

The impact of Litigants in Person on the Northern Ireland court system

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2017

Transparency and privacy in family courts

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2019

Implementation of recommendations of the Carlile report

View project
In progress

Justice | 2017 - 2020

Enhancing problem-solving practice in youth court

View project
In progress

Justice | 2013 - 2019

Timely disclosures mean timely interventions for young offenders and victims

View project
Reported

Justice | 2008 - 2012

The impact of anti-social behaviour interventions on young people

View project
Reported

Education | Justice | 2012 - 2015

Personal narratives and student achievement in pupil referral units

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

Looked after children grown up

View project
In progress

Justice | 2019 - 2022

Understanding criminogenic influences on youth offending

View project
In progress

Welfare | 2019 - 2022

Children living with domestic violence: effects on children’s well-being

View project
In progress

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The Edinburgh Study: causes and impacts of criminal justice pathways

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2019 - 2021

Girls and women with experience of care and the criminal justice system

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

The implementation of new rules and guidance for permanent foster care

View project
In progress

Justice | 2018 - 2020

Paths to administrative justice in Wales

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

System conditions and welfare inequalities in children’s services

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2020

Looked after children grown up

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2018 - 2019

Pathways of incarcerated children in care

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2018

Visualising data in care proceedings

View project
In progress

Justice | 2017 - 2020

The Mental Health MHTS For Scotland

View project
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2020

Birth fathers’ recurrent appearance in care proceedings

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2018

Addressing the ‘care cases’ crisis: a sector-led review

View project
Reported

Justice | 2017 - 2019

Immigration judicial reviews

View project
Siblings play ball in a playground - Siblings Contact and the Law
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2019

Siblings, contact and the law: an overlooked relationship?

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2017 - 2019

Measuring outcomes for children’s social care services

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2018

The dissemination of lessons from research to the Judiciary

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2018

The impact of Litigants in Person on the Northern Ireland court system

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2017

Transparency and privacy in family courts

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2019

Implementation of recommendations of the Carlile report

View project
Couple of African descent attends couples counselling to discuss finding fault in divorce
Reported

Justice | 2015 - 2019

Finding Fault? Divorce Law in practice in England and Wales

View project
Reported

Justice | 2015 - 2016

The fraud 'justice systems': a scoping study

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2015 - 2016

Feasibility study for research into improving children’s social services

View project
Reported

Justice | 2015 - 2017

The long-term consequences of domestic infant adoption

View project
Search projects

We aim to improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We are an open, collaborative and engaged funder that offers more than money. Through connecting the individual projects we fund, we strengthen their collective impact and give voice to an overarching narrative.

Profile