‘No win, no fee’ has made pursuing a clinical negligence claim more accessible for many but some serious cases may fall through the funding gap

By Nuffield Foundation

The growth in lawyers working on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis has removed the financial barrier to pursuing a clinical negligence claim for many people, but a small number of serious cases may be falling through the funding gap, according to research published by the Nuffield Foundation.

Since the late 1990s, the cost of making a claim has been transferred from the government (via legal aid) to lawyers operating on conditional fee arrangements (or CFAs, commonly known as ‘no win, no fee’). These lawyers then recover costs from the NHS on cases that they win.

A team of academics from the Universities of Nottingham, Oxford, and Surrey analysed data relating to clinical negligence claims between 2001 and 2013. The most significant change is the growing proportion of claims brought by people who would not have qualified for legal aid in 2001 (and who could not afford to self-fund), but who are now able to bring claims because of the increased availability of ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers. For example the proportion of those in the middle income group who pursued claims following an adverse event increased from less than 4% in 2001 to 22% in 2013.

Conversely, those in the lowest income group are now less likely to make a claim following an adverse event (7% in 2013 compared to 15% in 2001), indicating that the withdrawal of legal aid may have reduced the propensity of those on lower incomes to make claims.

The researchers also identify a possible reluctance on the part of ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers to consider high risk, high value claims, such as those involving serious injury to children. Since the implementation of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), incidents involving babies and children older than eight weeks are no longer eligible for legal aid, regardless of the damage sustained. If ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers do not take on such cases, then these children and their families may effectively be denied legal recourse, although the researchers point out that it is too soon to tell if this will indeed be the case.

These findings are published in a Nuffield Foundation briefing paper: Funding clinical negligence cases: access to justice at reasonable cost? Other key findings from the research include:

  • The number of claims for clinical negligence fell between 2001 and 2009 (perhaps reflecting a reduction in the frequency of adverse events) but then rose between 2009 and 2013. In 2012/13, there were 10,129 new claims of clinical negligence against NHS bodies, up from 6,652 in 2009/10. A total of £1,259 million was paid in connection with clinical negligence claims in 2012/13 (£205 million of which was claimants’ legal costs), compared with £787 million in 2009/10. This increase in claim frequency over recent years correlates with the emergence of ‘no win, no fee’ funding as the predominant route for making claims.
  • The proportion of successful claims increased from around 45% in 2001 to around 70% in 2009, possibly because ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers are more cautious about taking on risky claims than the Legal Services Commission (formerly responsible for administering legal aid). However, there are signs that this increase in the success rate had stopped (and may have been reversed) after 2009, corresponding to the period in which the frequency of claiming has been rising. This may reflect a less cautious approach to risk assessment on average as new, non-specialist law firms entered the clinical negligence market.
  • Cases taken on by ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers on average paid lower levels of damages, incurred lower costs and were shorter in duration than legal aid cases, presumably reflecting the greater complexity of legally aided claims relating to children.
  • Until April 2013 the NHS was liable for a ‘success fee’ on ‘no win, no fee cases’ to cover the costs of losing claims. This meant that legal costs represented a greater proportion of payments made by the NHS Litigation Authority in ‘no win, no fee’ cases than in cases funded by legal aid (53% compared to 36% in 2012/2013). However, since the implementation of LASPO in April 2013, the NHS is no longer responsible for paying success fees, and this element is now paid from the damages of successful claimants.

Professor Paul Fenn who led the project said: “There have been concerns that the shift to using ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers to fund the majority of clinical negligence claims might act as a barrier to justice because lawyers would be too cautious to take cases, or conversely that they would lead to a surge in ‘ambulance-chasing’ behaviour.

“Our research shows that neither of these things has happened, although we need to keep a close eye on high value claims relating to infants over eight weeks to ensure this group is not falling through the cracks. We also need to be aware of the recent trend towards higher claim frequencies and costs with a view to monitoring the impact of the LASPO reforms introduced in 2013.”

Teresa Williams, Director of Social Research and Policy at the Nuffield Foundation said: “This evidence provides a benchmark against which we can measure the longer term effects of legal aid reforms on clinical negligence litigation, but equally importantly it establishes an approach that could be used to assess the impact of these reforms in other areas of the law, something that is seriously lacking at the moment.”

NOTES

The research was undertaken by Paul Fenn, Emeritus Professor at Nottingham University Business School and Senior Visiting Fellow at the Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford; Alastair Gray, Professor of Health Economics and Director of the Nuffield Department of Population Health at the University of Oxford; Neil Rickman, Professor of Economics at the University of Surrey; and Dev Vencappa; Lecturer in Industrial Economics at Nottingham University Business School. The project was funded by the Nuffield Foundation.

The team used three datasets:

  • The Compensation Recovery Unit (CRU) dataset, which records information on all claims for compensation relating to personal injury in England and Wales.
  • A survey designed and administered by Ipsos MORI to provide data on the incidence of adverse events relating to healthcare, and whether a legal claim was pursued.
  • The NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) dataset, consisting of all claims made against NHS acute hospital trusts and settled between April 2008 and April 2013, including those outstanding at April 1st 2013.

Related


Explore our projects

A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
Little boy at home looking pensive, playing a game on a smartphone

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Linking household benefits, financial precarity and child welfare

View project
Man holds girl's hand as he walks her to primary school

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Improving safeguarding outcomes after adoption or special guardianship

View project
Mother and small child on a bus looking out of the window together and playing a game naming the things they see

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Parental Advocacy in England: a realist evaluation of implementation

View project
Portrait of a teenager in front of a blue shed, looking at the camera

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Children in police custody: piloting a ‘Child First’ approach 

View project
Father and child washing up in the kitchen

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Physical punishment and child outcomes in the UK

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Man turns towards the camera, walking in a town, with other walkers in the background

Justice | 2023 - 2023

Creating and using better justice data

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
Portrait of a teenager in front of a blue shed, looking at the camera

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Children in police custody: piloting a ‘Child First’ approach 

View project
Man holds girl's hand as he walks her to primary school

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Improving safeguarding outcomes after adoption or special guardianship

View project
Mother and small child on a bus looking out of the window together and playing a game naming the things they see

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Parental Advocacy in England: a realist evaluation of implementation

View project
Little boy at home looking pensive, playing a game on a smartphone

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Linking household benefits, financial precarity and child welfare

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Man leading a focus group listening to the participants speaking

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Lived experience of the law: a research and policy project

View project
Group of teenage boys at school in uniform
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2025

Exploring racial disparity in diversion from the youth justice system

View project
Dad holding baby walking with two kids
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Administrative fairness in the digital welfare state

View project
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Transparency and judicial review: a study of the duty of candour

View project
Worried woman alone in a room, resting her head on her arms
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Links between cognitive impairment and exploitation in England

View project
A teenage boy outdoors
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Child First: examining children’s collaboration in the Youth Justice System

View project
Young men looking puzzled as they look to another man for advice
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

The role of communities and connections in social welfare legal advice

View project
Two children walk ahead of two adults, one pushing a pram
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Voluntary care plans for children in Scotland: using Section 25 orders

View project
Rethinking domestic abuse in child protection: responding differently
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Rethinking domestic abuse in child protection: responding differently

View project
An older couple using a tablet to make a video call: Understanding local legal needs and supporting early intervention
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Understanding local legal needs and supporting early intervention

View project
A woman helping a little girl get ready for school
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Race, religion and representation among care-experienced children

View project
A parent or carer holds a small child
In progress

Justice | 2020 - 2023

Discharge of care orders: a national study

View project
A little girl smiles at her father
In progress

Justice | 2021 - 2024

Substituted parenting: what does this mean in the family court?

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Reported

Justice | 2021 - 2023

Delivering administrative justice after the pandemic

View project
Siblings play ball in a playground - Siblings Contact and the Law
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2021

Guidance to judges on the anonymisation of children judgements

View project
Lawyer taking witness statement from male witness
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The production of witness statements by lawyers and litigants in person

View project
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2022

When is a wedding not a marriage? Exploring non-legally binding ceremonies

View project
Toddler-gleefully-eats-baked-beans-How-COVID-19-is-affecting-food-security-proj
Reported

Welfare | 2020 - 2021

How the COVID-19 crisis is affecting food security

View project
Woman-medical-professional-treats-patient-impact-MSK-conditions-outcomes-other-illnesses-PROJ
Reported

Welfare | 2020 - 2022

The impact of musculoskeletal conditions on outcomes of other illnesses

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2022

The Edinburgh Study: causes and impacts of criminal justice pathways

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2015 - 2018

Bridging the Evidence Gap in Family Proceedings

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2018

The impact of Litigants in Person on the Northern Ireland court system

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2017

Transparency and privacy in family courts

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2019

Implementation of recommendations of the Carlile report

View project
Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile