Parents who lack litigation capacity in care proceedings

By Nuffield Foundation

Nuffield-funded research has identified for the first time the characteristics of parents lacking litigation capacity in care proceedings.

The research, led by Professor Penelope Welbourne from Plymouth University, also identified outcomes for children and parents over a twelve-month sample of all parents represented by the Official Solicitor in care proceedings, as well as key aspects of provision made to give them fair representation in court and to participate in hearings.

Key findings
  • Lack of litigation capacity may be due to mental health problems, intellectual disability or some other cause, or a combination of factors.
  • Capacity is issue specific, so some people may have capacity to make some decisions but not others within one set of proceedings. It can also fluctuate, especially when the underlying issue is a mental health problem.
  • Parents could start care proceedings having capacity and lose it, or vice versa, and some parents move in and out of capacity throughout proceedings. An instability in capacity might be exacerbated by the stress of proceedings for some parents, but some parents recovered capacity as their mental state improved during proceedings.
  • Section 20 ‘voluntary’ accommodation had been used for the children of some parents in our sample (named after s20 Children Act 1989, this involves a parent agreeing to a child coming in to care based on parental consent, not a court order). Given the subsequent finding that these parents lacked capacity, this raises questions about how rigorously local authorities assess capacity and how they seek consent to accommodation.
  • It is difficult for parents who lack litigation capacity to ‘turn things around’ within the duration of care proceedings (26 weeks). Very few parents ended proceedings with the care of their children, and although there were challenges to local authority care plans, it appears it is rare for this to lead to the child returning to the parent.
Recommendations
  • A review of the ability of courts to provide the technology and space needed to give all parents who have specialist communication and participation needs the opportunity to observe, understand and participate in hearings to the best of their ability.
  • In cases that require an interpreter, the support of an intermediary should be available to help the interpreter communicate with a parent who lacks litigation capacity.
  • Local authorities, and solicitors representing protected parties, should consider the implications of the duty to protect the right to procedural justice for meetings outside the court setting as well as in the court process itself. There appears to be variation in the extent to which local authorities fund advocates to help parents attend meetings, including with their solicitor, child protection conferences, and other key decision making meetings. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Human Rights Act 1998 and the Public Sector Equality Duty protect the right to procedural justice. Article 20 of the Equality Act 2010 relates to the duty to make adjustments to avoid disadvantage, among other things through the provision of auxiliary aid.
  • Support for letterbox and other indirect contact should be universally available for parents who lose the care of their children to adoption, and that support should take account of their specific needs.
Details of the study

The President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby and the Ministry of Justice gave permission for the authors to observe court hearings and for them to speak to members of the judiciary. In addition, the Official Solicitor and Cafcass/Cafcass Cymru agreed to reviews of files held by the Office of the Official Solicitor and for them to speak to their staff. The authors spoke to judges, solicitors, caseworkers at the Office of the Official Solicitor, barristers and Cafcass Children’s Guardians in a range of local authority and Family Court areas across England and Wales.

In order to find out more about the parents involved and the outcomes of care cases in which a parent lacks litigation capacity, the authors also undertook a retrospective file study incorporating all of the cases in which the Official Solicitor had agreed to act during a twelve month period (37 cases) and explored:

  • The reasons for the incapacity decision.
  • What happened to the children at the end of the proceedings.
  • Whether there were any indicators that the 26 week limit for proceedings might have specific implications for parents who lack litigation capacity.

They observed eighteen care hearings between August 2015 and December 2016.

Related


Explore our projects

A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
Little boy at home looking pensive, playing a game on a smartphone

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Linking household benefits, financial precarity and child welfare

View project
Man holds girl's hand as he walks her to primary school

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Improving safeguarding outcomes after adoption or special guardianship

View project
Mother and small child on a bus looking out of the window together and playing a game naming the things they see

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Parental Advocacy in England: a realist evaluation of implementation

View project
Portrait of a teenager in front of a blue shed, looking at the camera

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Children in police custody: piloting a ‘Child First’ approach 

View project
Father and child washing up in the kitchen

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Physical punishment and child outcomes in the UK

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Man turns towards the camera, walking in a town, with other walkers in the background

Justice | 2023 - 2023

Creating and using better justice data

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
A front view of a father and his two children. He is carrying his young son in his arms and his daughter is riding her scooter along the footpath as he pushes his son's scooter along the way.
New

Justice | Welfare | 2024 - 2026

Challenging justice inequalities with children in conflict with the law 

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
Man getting professional advice

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Applicants’ experience of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

View project
Portrait of a teenager in front of a blue shed, looking at the camera

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Children in police custody: piloting a ‘Child First’ approach 

View project
Man holds girl's hand as he walks her to primary school

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Improving safeguarding outcomes after adoption or special guardianship

View project
Mother and small child on a bus looking out of the window together and playing a game naming the things they see

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Parental Advocacy in England: a realist evaluation of implementation

View project
Little boy at home looking pensive, playing a game on a smartphone

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Linking household benefits, financial precarity and child welfare

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Man leading a focus group listening to the participants speaking

Justice | 2023 - 2026

Lived experience of the law: a research and policy project

View project
Group of teenage boys at school in uniform
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2025

Exploring racial disparity in diversion from the youth justice system

View project
Dad holding baby walking with two kids
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Administrative fairness in the digital welfare state

View project
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Transparency and judicial review: a study of the duty of candour

View project
A teenage boy outdoors
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Child First: examining children’s collaboration in the Youth Justice System

View project
Young men looking puzzled as they look to another man for advice
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

The role of communities and connections in social welfare legal advice

View project
Two children walk ahead of two adults, one pushing a pram
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Voluntary care plans for children in Scotland: using Section 25 orders

View project
Rethinking domestic abuse in child protection: responding differently
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Rethinking domestic abuse in child protection: responding differently

View project
An older couple using a tablet to make a video call: Understanding local legal needs and supporting early intervention
In progress

Justice | 2022 - 2024

Understanding local legal needs and supporting early intervention

View project
A woman helping a little girl get ready for school
In progress

Justice | Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Race, religion and representation among care-experienced children

View project
A parent or carer holds a small child
In progress

Justice | 2020 - 2023

Discharge of care orders: a national study

View project
A little girl smiles at her father
In progress

Justice | 2021 - 2024

Substituted parenting: what does this mean in the family court?

View project
Two sisters, 9 and 14, play on a swing together: Data and voice to improve children's lives
In progress

Justice | 2021 - 2026

Children’s information: improving lives through better listening and better data

View project
A young child splashing in a puddle next to his guardian and sister.
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Special guardianship families: experiences and support needs

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2024

Crossing Boundaries: Co-designing support for vulnerable young people

View project
New

Justice | 2024 - 2026

Breaking networks of youth serious violence

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2023

Born into care: best practice guidelines

View project
Reported

Justice | 2021 - 2023

Delivering administrative justice after the pandemic

View project
Siblings play ball in a playground - Siblings Contact and the Law
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2021

Guidance to judges on the anonymisation of children judgements

View project
Lawyer taking witness statement from male witness
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2021

The production of witness statements by lawyers and litigants in person

View project
Reported

Justice | 2020 - 2022

When is a wedding not a marriage? Exploring non-legally binding ceremonies

View project
Reported

Justice | 2019 - 2022

The Edinburgh Study: causes and impacts of criminal justice pathways

View project
Reported

Justice | Welfare | 2015 - 2018

Bridging the Evidence Gap in Family Proceedings

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2018

The impact of Litigants in Person on the Northern Ireland court system

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2017

Transparency and privacy in family courts

View project
Reported

Justice | 2016 - 2019

Implementation of recommendations of the Carlile report

View project
Reported

Justice | 2017 - 2020

Enhancing problem-solving practice in youth court

View project
Reported

Justice | 2013 - 2019

Timely disclosures mean timely interventions for young offenders and victims

View project
Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile