Funding social care proposals may offer opportunity to rationalise tax system for older people
26 June 2012
Raising revenue to pay for the proposals suggested by the Dilnot Commission on Funding of Care and Support offers an opportunity for the government to rationalise the tax and benefit system for those above State Pension Age, according to research undertaken by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and funded by the Nuffield Foundation.
The Dilnot Commission proposed changes which would involve a degree of co-payment between individuals and the state, and a much less harsh means test on assets than in the current system. The proposals would cost money - £1.7 billion a year in the short term.
The main beneficiaries of these changes would be pensioners with higher levels of income or significant assets. Dilnot therefore suggested that any tax rises or benefit cuts designed to pay for the proposals should be focussed on this group of better off pensioners.
In a report published today, IFS researchers look at how pensioner incomes have evolved in recent years, how the tax and benefit system provides additional support for pensioners and how it could be reformed to raise additional revenue from this group. Any such changes would of course be painful, and may not be the best way to fund the Dilnot proposals; but money could be found whilst also making the tax and benefit system more coherent in the way it affects pensioners.
Pensioner incomes have risen faster
The report shows how pensioner incomes have on average risen faster than those of the rest of the population:
Overall, pensioner incomes have risen by 29.4% since 1999 whilst non pensioner incomes have risen by 26.0%. More than 40% of pensioners are now in the top half of the income distribution compared to 25% twenty years ago.
Recent cohorts of pensioners have received higher levels of income from state and private pensions. Tax and benefit changes introduced under the Labour government of 1997–2010 also favoured pensioners.
Despite the phasing-out of the additional personal allowance announced in the last budget pensioners will also lose less on average than working-age people from the tax and benefit changes being introduced by the current government. Pensioner households will lose an average of £316 per year from these measures compared to £1,781 per year for households with children and £751 per year for working-age households without children.
The report shows how, on top of the system of state pensions and meanstested benefits such as Pension Credit, the tax and benefit system provides support for pensioners in a way which arguably sits uneasily with a well-designed system.
Additional benefits such as the winter fuel allowance, free bus passes and free TV licences have all been introduced or extended in recent years. Means testing the winter fuel allowance and TV licence could raise £1.4 billion a year – nearly enough to pay for the Dilnot proposals in the first instance.
Private pensions are generously treated by the tax system in several ways. Contributions made by employers are not subject to NICs at any point. A lump sum of up to £435,000 can be taken free of tax. These give big advantages to saving in a pension. Each 1p of NICs imposed on pensions in payment could raise £350 million a year. Not allowing tax free lump sums at all could raise up to £2.5 billion a year in the long run. But most would come from those with smaller sums: only about £500 million could be saved by limiting the tax free lump sum to £42,475, the level of the income tax higher-rate threshold.
Those in work over State Pension Age pay no NICs on their earnings at an Exchequer cost of £800 million.
Other elements of the tax system which arguably favour older people include forgiveness of capital gains tax at death. This costs £600 million a year and introduces a significant distortion into the tax system which ought to be rectified.
More direct taxation paid by working age households
Over the longer term a, perhaps unintended, consequence of gradually reducing rates of income tax whilst increasing NIC rates has been to shift the balance of direct taxation on to working age households. A pensioner with a gross income of £50,000 now loses 20% of that in direct taxes. A working age person with the same income loses 29% in income tax and NI.
Paul Johnson, the director of the IFS and a co-author of the report said:
“The Dilnot Commission’s proposals for funding social care represent a coherent way forward in an area where reform is long overdue. Should government choose, there are ways of raising money to pay for the changes from relatively well off pensioners, the group which will benefit most from the proposals.
"But it is important that any changes are made in the context of a clear strategy for the design of a coherent tax and benefit system that works well as a whole for both those above and those below the State Pension Age.
"Raising money is always painful, perhaps especially from pensioners who have little or no opportunity to increase incomes from other sources.”